The Power of Context (pt. 2)

When Rebecca Wells, a playwright and occasional actress had released her novel the Ya-Ya Sisterhood, the expectations in number of sales weren’t on a super grand scale, her previous novel had only sold around a respectable 15,000 hardcover copies, setting the projected outcome for this next release. Amazingly and just as unexpectedly as the crime in the New York subways came to an abrupt halt, something happened, it tipped.

Though the first few months showed signs of previous “normalcy,” the months to follow thereafter were astonishingly spectacular, the sales of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood quickly grew in sales and surpassed any expectation that Wells and her publisher could have ever imagined. This is what Gladwell refers to as “the power of context.” There were a few key factors that played a part into the tipping of this book. Well’s was a story teller, and an actress… she didn’t tour the country, stopping in every city to hold public readings and publicize her name in works, but when she did read publicly, it was a performance from the heart and captured her viewers, her first public reading only had around 7 viewers. Months later, she’d be reading to thousands.

Another key ingredient that had left a window of tipping opportunity, was the pure nature of the novel, it was “sticky,” a heartwarming tale between a mother and daughter, people connected with it and lived it. It was a topic starter, and was a book clubs dream novel, people were living the story and formed their own “sisterhoods” that portrayed the one in the story. The Ya-Ya Sisterhood tipped, not just because it was a beautifully written piece of work, but because it was a beautifully written piece of work that brought people together. The Ya-Ya Sisterhood had sold over 2.5 million copies.

Further in the chapter, Gladwell starts onto a journey of cognitive psychology. We learn of why humans, and some primates possess a larger neocortex of all the mammals. A man by the name of Bill Gore concluded that it was the size of the groups in which they live (we) live; and not just the diet of the animal. He came to this conclusion after a study in the group size and took into account of the cognitive ability of the animal.

It is apparently so, group size can and does determine the intelligence factor. It takes a certain amount of brain power in order to live and function in a group, we’d need to keep track of each groups member, and their relationships with each other member. In observation of this portion of the chapter, I conclude that maybe the most socially developed of creatures are the most intelligent.

I think of how we as humans have the ability to bond and build emotionally driven relationships, and think of how sometimes you get so overwhelmed with everything that you think your head will explode, but it doesn’t. Than I think wow, my brain is awesome, even though it gets a little funky. Which brings me to the limitations of the brain, the human brain. It has been researched that as awesome as our cognitive abilities are, there’s a limit of 7 and 150. We can keep track of 7 instances of a memory at one time, anymore and you are just guessing. We will also learn we have group limitations, it has been proven that when in a group, we can successfully keep track of 150 group members, if that number is surpassed… you’d begin to notice a negative effect in relationship quality.

The Ya-Ya Sisterhood “tipped” because of the groups that built relationships upon the context within the novel and it’s purpose, it connected groups upon groups to eventually spread like a cool breeze on a summers day, it was an enjoyable stimuli that fed onto the desire and need for us to connect. I think I might just go out and buy the book, just to see what all the hubbub is about.

The magic number 150.

When Rebecca wells, a playright and occassional actress released her
novel the  ya ya sister hood, the expectations weren't on a grand
scale, her previous novel had only sold around 10,000 hardcover
copies. So that was about the number that was projected for this
release. but as unexpecdedly as the crime in the new York subways came
to an abrupt haul, something amazing happened, though the first few
months showed signs of normalcy, the months to follow after were
astonishingly spectacular, the sales of the ya ya sisterhood quickly
surpaced what Wells a d her publisher could have ever imagined. This
is what Gladwell reffers to as "the power of context." While the first
public reading of the book
Advertisements

2 thoughts on “The Power of Context (pt. 2)

  1. It was domino/chain effect through fantastic writing capabilities of a genius who finally got her recognition as a writer! Only 7 people understood her genius and were genuine ‘real’ fans who weren’t ‘posers’. Everybody else was. Why? Social Darwinism. Those 7 people were lucky to been there at the right time & right place. Those 2.4 other million people who made Wells rich were all followers, had they known of her ‘genius’ they would of grasped it earlier and thus understand her ‘genius’ and they themselves become enlightened and produce more genius ideas and the product would of been genuine genius. I love the word ‘genius’.

    In conclusion, only the ‘real’ truly understand, while the ‘cattle’ makes us rich.

    Awesome posting!

    • haha, dude your too much. I too think genius is a spiffy word. and sometimes wish I were one. sometimes I just feel like the bull… no, not even… more like the donkey. xD

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s